Billo vs Pitching Brands Directly: Which Gets More UGC Deals?
Introduction
If you're tired of sending pitches into the void and waiting weeks for a response, you're not alone. Many UGC creators grapple with the uncertainty of whether to stick with passive platforms like Billo or take charge with direct outreach. The struggle is real: inconsistent income, stiff competition, and the dreaded ghosting from brands. Let's break down the nuances of Billo versus pitching brands directly to help you strategize your next move.
Understanding Billo UGC
Billo is a marketplace specifically designed for UGC creators, where you build a profile, apply to brand briefs, and then wait. Brands pay a starting rate of $99 per video, and you receive a portion of that fee. This setup means that brand selection is key, and with over 5,000 creators vying for attention, the competition is fierce. For instance, let's say you're a creator who specializes in eco-friendly beauty products. You find a brief on Billo, but so do dozens of others. The brand might filter applicants based on past performance, niche expertise, or even the type of equipment used. If you're just starting, this can be a tough hill to climb, especially if your profile history isn't robust yet.
Direct Pitching Basics
Direct pitching flips the script by putting you in control. Instead of waiting for brands to come to you, you actively seek them out. This approach allows you to tailor your pitches to specific brands, negotiate higher rates, and choose projects that align with your strengths. Consider a creator who targets fitness brands. By researching and reaching out to companies like smaller supplement brands or local gyms, they can personalize each pitch to highlight their unique style and results from past campaigns. This proactive stance often leads to more meaningful connections and, potentially, better pay. Typically, a well-crafted pitch might convert at around 5-10%, so sending out 50 pitches can realistically result in 2-5 projects.
Billo vs Direct Pitching
The choice between Billo and direct pitching isn't cut and dried. On Billo, if 1 in 10 briefs picks you, you'd need to apply to 100 to land 10 deals. With direct pitching, you control the volume, so if you send 200 personalized messages, you might secure 10-20 deals, depending on your niche and pitch quality. Take a food blogger who specializes in vegan recipes. Using Billo might mean waiting for the perfect brief to appear, while direct pitching allows them to reach out to vegan-friendly brands directly, cutting down the waiting time and increasing their project pool.
Pros and Cons of Each Strategy
Billo's primary advantage is its ease of use, set up your profile, apply to briefs, and wait. However, it can be limiting, especially if you're new. The platform favors creators with a proven track record, and you're dependent on the marketplace rates set by brands. Direct pitching, on the other hand, offers more control and potential for higher earnings. You can negotiate rates and choose projects that are a perfect fit. But, it requires significant effort in research, crafting pitches, and following up. The flexibility comes with a higher time investment.
Common Mistakes
- Relying Solely on Billo: New creators often think Billo will handle everything. Instead, diversify your efforts to include direct outreach.
- Generic Pitches: Sending mass emails with no personalization won't cut it. Target your pitches to the brand's needs and voice.
- Ignoring Feedback: Both on Billo and in direct outreach, failing to adapt based on feedback can limit your success.
- Overlooking Small Brands: Emerging brands may not pay top dollar initially but can offer long-term partnerships.
- Skipping Follow-Ups: Many creators send one pitch and wait. Following up can often double your chances of getting a response.
- Neglecting Your Portfolio: A weak or outdated portfolio can hurt your chances. Keep it updated with your best work.
- Underestimating the Market: Not understanding the competitive landscape can lead to misaligned pitches and missed opportunities.
Next Steps
First, integrate both strategies into your workflow. Use Billo for passive opportunities and direct pitching for active outreach. To streamline this process without adding manual cold emails, consider a tool like UGC Roster, which automates outreach and helps manage both strategies simultaneously. Start by updating your portfolio, identifying target brands, and crafting personalized pitches. Remember, the combination of both approaches often leads to a more consistent income stream.
FAQ
What is Billo UGC and how does it work? Billo UGC is a platform where you can apply to brand briefs for video content creation. You create a profile, browse listings, and apply to projects that suit your niche. For example, if you're into tech gadgets, you'd look for brands needing reviews or unboxings. Once you apply, you wait to see if you're chosen. Brands pay $99 per video, and you get a cut. It's competitive, with over 5,000 creators, so standing out with a strong portfolio is key.
Billo UGC review: is it worth it for creators? Billo can be worth it if you're looking for an easy entry point into UGC work. It streamlines the process, allowing you to focus on content rather than finding clients. However, if you're just starting, it might take a while to land gigs. For instance, only 10% of briefs might result in a deal for new creators. If you’re patient and can build your profile, it could complement direct pitching efforts.
Billo creator review: what creators actually say after using it Many creators appreciate Billo for its simplicity and structure, but some find the competition tough. A friend of mine who creates fashion content said she got accepted for 2 out of 15 briefs. She noted that building a strong profile and applying strategically to briefs that match her niche were crucial. While some creators praise the platform for its ease, others suggest supplementing with direct outreach for more consistent income.
Billo UGC pricing: how much does it cost for creators? Billo doesn’t charge creators upfront; instead, they take a cut from the $99 brands pay per video. This means you don’t have to worry about initial costs, but your earnings per video are reduced. For instance, if you're doing three videos a month, you'll receive only a portion of the $297 total. While it’s cost-effective to start, consider this margin when planning your income.
Best Billo alternatives for UGC creators in 2026 In 2026, you might look into platforms like AspireIQ or Grapevine for alternatives. AspireIQ, for example, offers more personalized brand connections and often higher pay rates, which can be beneficial if you’re experienced. A creator I know found success with AspireIQ, landing gigs that paid $200+ per video, doubling what she made on Billo. Such platforms can offer more control and potentially higher payouts.
Is Billo free for UGC creators? Yes, Billo is free to join for UGC creators as there are no upfront fees. You simply sign up, create your profile, and start applying to briefs. However, they do take a portion of the payment from brands. For example, if you complete a $99 video project, you won't see the full amount in your account, as Billo retains a cut for facilitating the connection. It's cost-effective for starting out but impacts your net earnings.
How to get more UGC deals than just waiting on Billo To get more UGC deals, combine Billo with proactive direct outreach. Let’s say you’re into gaming content; research and pitch to indie game developers, tailoring your message to highlight your previous work. A friend of mine sends 100 pitches monthly, with a 5% conversion rate, landing about 5 extra projects. This method diversifies your opportunities and can significantly boost your income stream beyond what Billo alone offers.
Billo UGC marketplace vs cold outreach: pros and cons for creators Billo offers convenience and structure, ideal if you’re balancing multiple gigs or new to UGC. But, the competition is intense, and earnings per project are fixed. In contrast, cold outreach gives you control over your rates and projects, but requires time and effort. A creator who did both shared that while Billo offered quick, albeit lower-paying gigs, cold outreach led to personalized higher-paying deals, making the hustle worthwhile.
Billo UGC app review 2026 As of 2026, the Billo UGC app continues to be user-friendly, streamlining the application process for brand briefs. However, some creators still mention the stiff competition. A beauty creator I know appreciates the app’s straightforwardness but wishes for more personalized recommendations. She applies to about 20 briefs a month, landing 2-3 projects consistently. While it’s a solid tool, pairing it with other strategies could enhance your reach.
UGC marketplace vs outreach: which strategy earns more for creators? Direct outreach generally results in higher earnings if done right, as it allows you to negotiate rates. For instance, while Billo might cap at $99 per video, outreach can net $200 or more per project if you leverage past successes. A creator I know doubled her income by targeting brands directly, securing deals that paid twice what she made on marketplaces. It requires more effort but can significantly boost your income.
Related reading